Malta’s government is consulting on a series of amendments to its competition law, in part to remedy constitutional defects brought to light in 2016.
It is being proposed that the Competition and Consumer Appeals Tribunal will be abolished, and instead, decisions made by the regulator may be challenged before the Civil Court (Commercial Section).
The Court of Appeal decided in May 2016, that certain provisions of the Competition Act were unconstitutional. It was deciding a case the Federation of Estate Agents had instituted, feeling aggrieved by the Director for Competition’s decision to proceed against it over alleged breaches of the law. The federation argued only a proper court could decide such matters, which, it pointed out, could result in an administrative fine of up to €1.25 million (US$1.4 million).
Its application was upheld by the Civil Court in 2015, and the decision was confirmed on appeal a year later. In view of this, the Director General for Competition announced he would not impose sanctions until changes were made to bring the law in line with the Constitution.
Furthermore, in line with what is being proposed, decisions made by the directors general responsible for competition and for consumer affairs could be challenged on points of law and fact.
While the court would have the power to revoke decisions by the directors, any administrative fines would be automatically suspended pending the outcome of the appeal.
In case of settlement, the 10% reduction in the fine would be revised upwards to an amount varying between 10% and 35%, with the objective being to encourage settlements over court disputes.
Full Content: The Times of Malta
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand