![](https://www.pymnts.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/022-e1632385841854.jpg)
By: Jay Ezreliev (Truth On The Market)
One of the key changes in the draft merger guidelines of the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the U.S. Justice Department (DOJ) is the shift away from market power as the primary focus of merger enforcement. In the 2010 horizontal merger guidelines, the central idea was that mergers should not be allowed to create, strengthen, or perpetuate market power or make it easier to exploit. However, the draft guidelines no longer include this overarching principle.
The abandonment of market power enhancement as the primary focus in merger enforcement will have significant implications for antitrust regulation. Firstly, it means that the enforcement of mergers will no longer prioritize the interests of consumers over those of the merging companies’ competitors. Secondly, it results in the removal of a crucial criterion in merger enforcement. Courts have previously recognized that proving an increase in market power is essential in a merger challenge under antitrust law. For instance, the U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit emphasized this in its 2001 FTC v. H.J. Heinz decision, stating that “merger enforcement, like other areas of antitrust, is aimed at addressing market power.” The draft guidelines, however, no longer require demonstrating an increase in market power as a fundamental element in a merger case.
The absence of this critical criterion in merger enforcement could potentially grant the FTC and the DOJ’s Antitrust Division more freedom to scrutinize all mergers, possibly pursuing objectives that extend beyond antitrust concerns. This could lead to political enforcement that serves the interests of the administration in power, a development that could raise concerns within the antitrust field…
Featured News
Nvidia and Microsoft Sued for Allegedly Undercutting AI Technology Patent Prices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
White & Case Strengthens Antitrust and M&A Practices with New Partner Additions
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Judge Dismisses Antitrust Lawyers’ Fee Demand Over JetBlue-Spirit Deal
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Boston Landlords Named as US Sues RealPage Over Alleged Rent-Inflating Practices
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Judge to Weigh Landmark NCAA Settlement Proposal in Antitrust Lawsuit
Sep 5, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Canada & Mexico
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competitive Convergence: Mexico’s 30-Year Quest for Antitrust Parity with its Northern Neighbor
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Competition and Digital Markets in North America: A Comparative Study of Antitrust Investigations in Mexico and the United States
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
Recent Antitrust Development in Mexico: COFECE’s Preliminary Report on Amazon and Mercado Libre
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI
The Cost of Making COFECE Disappear
Sep 3, 2024 by
CPI