The American Board of Internal Medicine persuaded the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit on Thursday, February 25, to uphold its victory against claims that it uses its monopoly on the physician specialty credentialing process to squeeze renewal fees out of doctors with no alternative, reported Bloomberg.
The internists leading the antitrust lawsuit “argue that they are ‘forced’ to purchase” the renewals, called “maintenance of certification,” because of the “economic reality” that they’re unlikely to be hired without them, Judge Joseph A. Greenaway Jr. wrote for the court.
The lawsuit claimed that the ABIM’s authority to board-certify internists initially and its maintenance of certification program are separate “products;” and that ABIM illegally ties the two together, forcing internists to purchase MOC from ABIM or risk losing their board-certified status.
It also charged the ABIM with violating RICO laws and with “unjust enrichment.” The plaintiffs were four internists, all of whom encountered some problem while attempting to maintain their certification, and three or whom are currently listed as “not certified” on ABIM’s website. The suit was filed in the US District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand