Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
In a significant legislative development, Mexico’s lower house of Congress has approved a constitutional proposal aimed at dismantling seven autonomous regulatory agencies. The measure, described by supporters as a step toward streamlining governance, has sparked widespread debate over its potential implications for institutional independence and economic agreements.
On Wednesday night, lawmakers voted 347-128 in favor of the proposal’s general text, with individual articles securing approval the following day. The bill will now proceed to the Senate, where the ruling coalition is just one vote shy of the two-thirds majority required for constitutional amendments.
The proposed legislation targets seven oversight bodies: the transparency institute (INAI), the antitrust regulator (Cofece), the telecommunications watchdog (IFT), the energy regulator (CRE), the hydrocarbon regulator (CNH), the commission for educational oversight (Mejoredu), and the council for evaluating social policies (Coneval). According to a statement from President Claudia Sheinbaum, the move will result in budgetary savings, as their functions will be absorbed by various government ministries.
Read more: Mexican Watchdog Proposes Fintech Reforms to Boost Financial Inclusion
Critics, however, warn that the plan could compromise the independence of these organizations, with some expressing concerns about potential repercussions for international agreements such as the United States-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA). The trade pact is scheduled for review in 2026, and opponents argue that the changes could undermine key provisions related to fair competition and transparency.
To address these concerns, Ricardo Monreal, leader of the ruling Morena party in the lower house, introduced a proposal during the debates. Per a statement from lawmakers, this amendment would establish decentralized agencies to ensure the antitrust regulator and telecommunications watchdog retain technical autonomy and independent resources, even as some of their roles are integrated into government offices.
This adjustment, described by Monreal as a safeguard for maintaining competition oversight, was seen as a concession to critics. According to Reforma, the new agencies would be tasked with preventing and addressing monopolistic practices and ensuring barriers to competition are removed.
Source: MSN
Featured News
Biden Blocks Nippon Steel’s $14.9 Billion Bid for US Steel
Jan 3, 2025 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand