Two prominent racing teams, including 23XI Racing, co-owned by NBA legend Michael Jordan, have withdrawn their appeal in an ongoing antitrust dispute against NASCAR. The appeal sought to overturn a court ruling that denied a preliminary injunction addressing allegations of monopolistic practices in the stock car racing industry, according to Bloomberg.
The teams, 23XI and Front Row Motorsports, filed a motion on Wednesday to dismiss their appeal, citing “changed circumstances” in the underlying case. Per Bloomberg, NASCAR recently removed a controversial antitrust release requirement from its agreements, a move that now permits the teams to compete as open teams in the 2024 season. However, open teams are excluded from the financial benefits and privileges available to NASCAR’s chartered teams, noted Jeffrey Kessler, an attorney for Winston & Strawn LLP, in a statement.
The decision to withdraw the appeal follows a ruling earlier this month by Judge Frank D. Whitney of the US District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The judge determined that the plaintiffs had not demonstrated the immediate and irreparable harm required to justify a preliminary injunction, pointing instead to speculative or potential harm, Bloomberg reported.
Related: Judge Denies NASCAR Teams’ Injunction Request in Antitrust Case
The lawsuit, initially filed in October, accuses NASCAR of enforcing anticompetitive restrictions, such as noncompete agreements that bar teams from participating in races outside the NASCAR circuit. Additionally, the teams took issue with a clause in NASCAR’s charter agreements requiring participants to waive antitrust claims as part of their contractual obligations.
In a filing, NASCAR’s attorneys supported the teams’ voluntary dismissal of the appeal, agreeing that further litigation would be unnecessary. “The District Court correctly denied Plaintiff-Appellants’ request for a preliminary injunction after finding that they had failed to establish any irreparable harm,” the legal team stated, according to Bloomberg. NASCAR’s lawyers emphasized that continuing the appeal would only drain the time and resources of the parties involved.
While the appeal has been dropped, the core antitrust lawsuit remains ongoing, with potential implications for NASCAR’s governance and the broader competitive landscape of professional stock car racing.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand