In the ongoing antitrust trial against Google, Microsoft has accused Apple of using its search engine, Bing, as a mere bargaining chip in the search-engine wars with Google. Mikhail Parakhin, the head of Microsoft’s advertising and web services, testified that Apple never seriously considered switching to Bing as the default search engine for iPhones reported Bloomberg.
For nearly two decades, Apple has relied on Google as the default search engine in its Safari browser. However, Microsoft has been actively trying to displace Google and make Bing the default search engine for iPhones. Parakhin’s testimony sheds light on the challenges Microsoft has faced in its attempts to compete with Google’s dominance in the search engine market.
During the trial, Parakhin stated, “Apple is making more money on Bing existing than Bing does.” This statement highlights the perception that Apple has been benefiting financially from its partnership with Google, making it less inclined to consider Bing as a viable alternative.
According to Bloomberg, the rivalry between Google and Microsoft in the search-engine arena is not new. Both companies have been vying for dominance and market share for years. However, Microsoft’s claims against Apple reveal the complex dynamics at play in this competitive landscape.
Related: Google Calls Out Microsoft Over Anticompetitive Cloud Practices
Apple’s choice of default search engine holds significant influence over user behavior and revenue generation. Being the default search engine for iPhones would provide a substantial boost to Bing’s user base and potentially increase Microsoft’s advertising revenue. However, Apple’s loyalty to Google has remained steadfast, despite Microsoft’s persistent efforts.
Parakhin’s testimony underscores Microsoft’s frustration with Apple’s approach. He stated that Bing was never given serious consideration, and Apple used it as a bargaining chip in negotiations with Google. This suggests that Apple leveraged Bing’s existence to extract more favorable terms from Google, rather than genuinely considering a switch.
The antitrust trial against Google aims to examine the company’s alleged anti-competitive practices and dominance in the search-engine market. Microsoft’s testimony regarding Apple’s use of Bing as a bargaining chip adds another layer to the complex web of rivalries and negotiations in this industry.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
US Judge OKs $110 Million Settlements in Antitrust Case Against Major Real Estate Brokerages
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
50 States and Territories Reach $49.1 Million Settlement in Generic Drug Price-Fixing Case
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
OpenAI Enhances ChatGPT with New Search Feature, Challenging Google’s Dominance
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
First Circuit Hears Arguments on Whether Federal Baseball Antitrust Exemption Shields Puerto Rican League from Legal Claims
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Appeals Court Expresses Doubts Over FCC’s Authority in Net Neutrality Revival
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI