Microsoft’s Smith Applauds UK’s ‘Tough and Fair’ Stance Post Activision Blizzard Deal
Microsoft President Brad Smith has expressed his appreciation for the UK’s Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), describing the regulatory body as “tough and fair.” This comes after the CMA initially blocked Microsoft’s massive $68.7 billion deal with Activision Blizzard last year.
The controversy began in April when the CMA raised concerns about the proposed deal, leading Smith to criticize the regulator and express his disappointment, stating that confidence in the UK had been “severely shaken.” At the time, he even claimed that the European Union was a more attractive place to start a business than the UK, marking it as the “darkest day” for Microsoft in its four decades of working in Britain.
However, in a recent interview with the BBC’s Radio 4 Today program, Smith acknowledged a change in perspective. “I certainly learned a lot personally,” he admitted. “I wouldn’t step back necessarily from all of the concerns I raised when I talked way back in April, but I might choose slightly different words to make my point.”
Related: UK Regulator Throws Lifeline To Microsoft-Activision Blizzard Deal
The CMA forced Microsoft to restructure its Activision Blizzard deal, particularly requiring the tech giant to relinquish key cloud gaming rights in the UK and several other global markets. Despite the challenges, Smith commended the CMA’s strict standards. “The CMA held to a tough standard, and I respect that. In my view, it was tough and fair,” he stated. “It pushed Microsoft to change the acquisition that we had proposed for Activision Blizzard, to spin out certain rights that the CMA was concerned about with respect to cloud gaming.”
While Smith may have had a change of heart regarding his criticism of the CMA, the regulatory body was less impressed with Microsoft’s approach. CMA CEO Sarah Cardell issued a warning in October, stating, “Businesses and their advisors should be in no doubt that the tactics employed by Microsoft are no way to engage with the CMA.” She emphasized that Microsoft had the opportunity to restructure the deal during the initial investigation but chose to insist on measures that the CMA deemed unworkable, ultimately leading to a protracted process that consumed time and resources.
Despite the hurdles, Microsoft’s concessions allowed the deal with Activision Blizzard to close in October, following months of regulatory scrutiny globally. However, it’s worth noting that the Federal Trade Commission in the United States is still actively pursuing its case against Microsoft’s deal.
Source: The Verge
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh