Meat processors Mountaire Farms and Case Foods have reached a settlement agreement amounting to $22 million. This resolves claims in US court alleging that the companies conspired to suppress wages of poultry workers. With this settlement, the total amount paid out in the litigation surpasses $217 million.
According to reports by Reuters, plaintiffs’ attorneys filed a request on Monday asking US District Judge Stephanie Gallagher in Maryland to preliminarily approve the settlements. These agreements mark the 10th and 11th deals in the ongoing case. Mountaire has agreed to pay $13.5 million, while Case Foods will pay $8.5 million, as indicated in the settlement papers. Both companies, based in North Carolina, have vehemently denied any wrongdoing, reiterating their decision to settle to avoid the costs associated with further litigation.
The lawsuit, initially filed in 2019, targets a total of 10 poultry processors. The plaintiffs allege that these companies collectively engaged in a conspiracy to suppress wages. According to the plaintiffs, in a competitive labor market, the companies would have been expected to compete vigorously for workers by offering higher wages and benefits.
Read more: Meat Industry Giants Face Renewed Antitrust Lawsuits
Attorney Shana Scarlett, representing the plaintiffs, emphasized the inherent risks in complex antitrust class actions, stating, “The plaintiffs can never be entirely assured of a finding of liability by a jury.”
As part of the settlement agreements, Mountaire and Case are obligated to cooperate with the plaintiffs by providing documents and other essential information. This cooperation is crucial as the litigation proceeds against companies that have yet to settle, including industry giants like Tyson Foods and others.
The preliminary approval of these settlements follows previous agreements, including a $60.6 million settlement by Perdue and a $38.3 million resolution by Sanderson Farms. Wayne Farms also agreed to pay $31.5 million. However, none of the settling companies have admitted liability in the case.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand