The NCAA and the Southeastern Conference (SEC) have approved a $2.8 billion settlement of antitrust claims, bringing college athletics closer to implementing wide-ranging changes. This settlement addresses three major antitrust lawsuits that have threatened the NCAA with billions in damages.
The SEC, the latest league to agree to the settlement, saw its presidents and chancellors vote unanimously in favor on Thursday, according to sources with direct knowledge of the decision who spoke to The Associated Press under condition of anonymity.
The settlement entails over $2.75 billion in payments from the NCAA to former Division I athletes and introduces a future revenue-sharing model between power-conference schools and athletes. This agreement is outlined by the law firms Hagens Berman and Winston & Strawn LLP, who represent the plaintiffs in the cases House v. NCAA, Hubbard v. NCAA, and Carter v. NCAA.
The revenue-sharing model, which could be implemented as early as next year, is optional for power-conference programs. It would allocate 22 percent of these schools’ average annual revenue, estimated to exceed $20 million per school, directly to athletes.
Read more: NCAA Antitrust Settlement Clears First Approval Stage
The damages, available to Division I athletes dating back to 2016 as compensation for lost name, image, and likeness (NIL) earning opportunities, will be disbursed over ten years.
If a judge approves the settlement, it would mark a significant shift in the NCAA’s longstanding amateur sports model. This model, which has only recently begun to allow athletes to earn endorsement money, would be further disrupted by permitting revenue-sharing between schools and their athletes.
Source: AP News
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand