A potential multibillion-dollar settlement of an antitrust lawsuit against the NCAA has advanced past the first step of a three-step approval process. This landmark settlement could reshape the financial landscape of college athletics, with the initial proposal indicating no changes to a payment structure that requires the 27 college conferences not named in the suit to bear the majority of a $1.6 billion portion of the damages, as reported by Market Watch.
On Monday night, the Division I Board of Directors finance committee approved the proposed $2.77 billion settlement of the case known as House v. NCAA. The committee passed the settlement to the full board, recommending adherence to the original financial plan. This plan involves significant financial contributions from various conferences, particularly those outside the five power conferences.
Tuesday saw the Big 12 becoming the first power conference to approve the settlement terms, according to sources from 247Sports. Other major conferences are expected to conduct similar votes in the coming days, signaling a collective move towards resolution.
Jeffrey Kessler, the attorney representing the plaintiffs in the House case, expressed optimism about the progress. “We are optimistic that a transformative moment for college sports may be very close,” Kessler told 247Sports.
Related: NCAA Faces Bankruptcy Threat from Antitrust Lawsuits
The anticipated resolution of House v. NCAA could be finalized as soon as this week. The settlement would require the NCAA to pay approximately $2.7 billion in back damages over the next decade. According to a memo obtained by multiple media outlets, this amount includes $1.6 billion derived from reductions in NCAA distributions over the next ten years. About 40% of this reduction will come from the five power conferences, which include 68 power-conference schools, while nearly 300 Division I programs outside this category will also be affected. Division II and Division III schools are not expected to be impacted at this stage, though this may change.
The remaining $1.1 billion of the settlement will be sourced from NCAA reserves, budget cuts, and other financial adjustments. This comprehensive financial plan aims to balance the burden of the settlement across various levels of college sports institutions, ensuring the NCAA can meet its obligations without crippling any single entity.
Source: Market Watch
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand