The Australian Treasury has put forth a new regulatory proposal aimed at bringing digital asset platforms under the purview of the Australian Financial Services Licence (AFSL) framework. The proposed changes are designed to address issues related to “consumer harms” associated with digital assets, including problems arising from ineffective management, governance deficiencies, operational vulnerabilities, conflicts of interest, and instances of fraudulent activities.
To address these concerns, the proposed regulatory regime introduces four key amendments to the existing legislative procedures.
Firstly, the proposal calls for digital asset platforms to be subject to the same standards as other financial services providers within the country’s current framework. This approach is referred to as “similar activity, similar risk, same regulatory outcome.”
The second amendment expands the scope of licensing requirements for digital asset platforms. If the proposal becomes law, any business offering custodial or depository services, financial product advice, or holding more than AUD 1,500 per client or more than AUD 5 million in total assets would be required to obtain an AFSL.
Related: Australian Lawmakers Submit New Crypto Regulation Bill
The third amendment focuses on facility contracts, which can evolve into platforms by partnering with other functions. Under this amendment, all arrangements involving digital asset facilities would need to be structured as non-discretionary arrangements, meaning that facilities must operate according to pre-agreed and transparent rules and procedures.
The final proposal targets the regulation of digital assets that do not fall under the category of financial products, such as tokenized collectibles. This amendment mandates that platforms dealing with these types of products must now adhere to minimum standards and functions in areas like token staking and asset tokenization.
The Australian Treasury’s proposed regulatory changes aim to enhance oversight and ensure the integrity of digital asset platforms while protecting consumers from potential risks and fraudulent activities. These proposals signal a significant step towards a more robust and comprehensive regulatory framework for the digital asset sector in Australia.
Source: Fintech Futures
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand