Gilead Sciences, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, and Teva Pharmaceuticals were named in a lawsuit filed by New Mexico Attorney General Hector Balderas for violating the state’s Antitrust Act and Unfair Practices Act, reported Bloomberg.
The lawsuit, filed in the First Judicial District Court of New Mexico, stems from the development, marketing, and manufacturing of several antiretroviral medications used in the prevention and treatment of the HIV virus
Lawsuit alleges that the defendants “engaged in coordinated schemes and anticompetitive agreements to suppress the entry of cheaper generic versions of each drug into the market, and to delay the development of safer drugs.
A press release from the attorney general explains that the lawsuit alleges that the defendants engaged in coordinated schemes and anti-competitive agreements in order to repress the entry of cheaper generic versions of each drug into the market and to hinder the development of safer, more effective treatment drugs as a means to maintain a grip on the market for antiretroviral treatment. The lawsuit claims these actions resulted in inflated prices for the lifesaving drugs as well as hundreds of millions of dollars in anticompetitive profits to the defendants.
“Putting profits over the critical needs of New Mexican patients and risking their health and safety is unacceptable,” said Attorney General Balderas in a press release. “My office will hold anyone accountable who takes advantage of or harms our families.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand