FanDuel’s founders and more than 100 former employees say the company’s board of directors and private-equity investors intentionally undervalued the sports-betting operator to shut them out of an acquisition deal, according to a lawsuit filed Tuesday.
FanDuel, the fantasy-sports giant now pursuing the growing U.S. sports-betting market, merged with the U.S. operations of Dublin-based gambling operator Paddy Power Betfair PLC in 2018 to create FanDuel Group. Paddy Power was later renamed Flutter Entertainment.
In a lawsuit filed in New York Supreme Court, FanDuel founders and former employees who were shareholders say they received nothing in the all-stock deal, after the board of directors, including current Chief Executive Matt King, and private-equity investors Shamrock Capital Advisors and KKRreduced what the new company was worth.
In response, a FanDuel spokeswoman said the sale to Paddy Power “followed a thorough process in accordance with the company’s governance rules and represented fair-market value.”
Shamrock Capital Advisors and KKR issued a joint statement that said: “We are confident that the facts will demonstrate that the allegations in this lawsuit are completely baseless.”
The deal with Paddy Power was announced about one week after the U.S. Supreme Court issued a decision that cleared the way for states beyond Nevada to legalize sports wagering, opening the door for a new U.S. sports betting industry.
Before that ruling, FanDuel was valued at about $1.2 billion leading up to a proposed merger with rival fantasy-sports app DraftKings, a deal that unraveled under opposition from antitrust regulators in 2017. The lawsuit claims the company maintained its billion-dollar valuation after the merger fell through.
In the 2018 deal with Paddy Power, the lawsuit argues, FanDuel’s board of directors chose not to obtain an independent valuation, ignored the potential implications of legalized sports betting after the Supreme Court’s decision and didn’t hold a shareholders’ vote on the deal.
Full Content: Wall Street Journal
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Massachusetts AG Sues Insulin Makers and PBMs Over Alleged Price-Fixing Scheme
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Apple and Amazon Avoid Mass Lawsuit in UK Over Alleged Collusion
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Top Agent Network Drops Antitrust Suit Against National Association of Realtors
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Weil, Gotshal & Manges Strengthens Antitrust Practice with New Partner
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Russian Court Imposes Hefty Fine on Google for Non-Compliance with Content Removal Orders
Jan 14, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand