In a significant move, New York City has officially prohibited the use of TikTok on government-owned devices, citing concerns regarding security. This decision aligns the city with several other municipalities and states across the United States that have already taken similar steps to impose restrictions on the popular short video-sharing platform.
TikTok, an application embraced by over 150 million Americans, finds itself at the center of an ongoing debate due to its ownership by the Chinese technology giant, ByteDance. Heightened anxieties over potential influence from the Chinese government have prompted an increasing number of U.S. legislators to advocate for a nationwide ban on the platform.
The statement issued by the administration of New York City Mayor Eric Adams asserted that TikTok presents a credible security risk to the city’s technological networks. This concern underscores the urgency of the decision to prohibit its use on government devices.
Read more: TikTok Updates Data Usage Regulations To Fit EU Laws
Under the newly implemented policy, all New York City agencies are mandated to uninstall the TikTok application within a 30-day timeframe. Additionally, employees will no longer be able to access the app or its website using city-owned devices and networks. It’s important to note that this move echoes a prior decision made at the state level; New York State had already taken measures to ban TikTok on mobile devices issued by the state.
The decision by New York City to ban TikTok on government-owned devices adds to the growing wave of actions taken across the nation to address potential security risks associated with the platform. As discussions regarding the reach of foreign apps continue, the role of technology in national security remains at the forefront of policy considerations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand