In a significant move, New York City has officially prohibited the use of TikTok on government-owned devices, citing concerns regarding security. This decision aligns the city with several other municipalities and states across the United States that have already taken similar steps to impose restrictions on the popular short video-sharing platform.
TikTok, an application embraced by over 150 million Americans, finds itself at the center of an ongoing debate due to its ownership by the Chinese technology giant, ByteDance. Heightened anxieties over potential influence from the Chinese government have prompted an increasing number of U.S. legislators to advocate for a nationwide ban on the platform.
The statement issued by the administration of New York City Mayor Eric Adams asserted that TikTok presents a credible security risk to the city’s technological networks. This concern underscores the urgency of the decision to prohibit its use on government devices.
Read more: TikTok Updates Data Usage Regulations To Fit EU Laws
Under the newly implemented policy, all New York City agencies are mandated to uninstall the TikTok application within a 30-day timeframe. Additionally, employees will no longer be able to access the app or its website using city-owned devices and networks. It’s important to note that this move echoes a prior decision made at the state level; New York State had already taken measures to ban TikTok on mobile devices issued by the state.
The decision by New York City to ban TikTok on government-owned devices adds to the growing wave of actions taken across the nation to address potential security risks associated with the platform. As discussions regarding the reach of foreign apps continue, the role of technology in national security remains at the forefront of policy considerations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh