According to the Financial Times, the Partnership for New York City (PFNYC), a prominent civic group advocating for Manhattan’s business interests, has recently turned its attention to a high-profile legal battle involving two major “accessible luxury” brands: Coach and Michael Kors.
Last week, PFNYC publicly urged New York’s senators and senior House Representatives to oppose a lawsuit filed by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC). The FTC is challenging the proposed merger of Tapestry, which owns Coach, and Capri Holdings, the parent company of Michael Kors. The merger, valued at over $20 billion, would also bring together the Kate Spade brand under a single corporate umbrella.
The FTC argues that the merger could harm consumers by eliminating competition in the upper middle-class, “accessible luxury” handbag market. However, PFNYC’s letter dismisses the FTC’s action as “ideologically motivated” and a “clear case of regulatory over-reach,” reflecting the group’s broader concerns about the impact on New York’s business community.
The New York connection to the case is significant: both Coach and Michael Kors are headquartered in the city, and Joanne Crevoiserat, CEO of Tapestry, serves on PFNYC’s executive committee. The letter’s appeal highlights the group’s vested interest in protecting local business interests, particularly given the influential members of PFNYC, including top mergers and acquisitions bankers and lawyers, whose fortunes are closely tied to a thriving deals marketplace. Notable supporters include Blair Effron, Brad Karp, and Rodgin Cohen, who are also known for their support of Vice President Kamala Harris.
As the FTC continues its review, the debate over the merger underscores the tension between regulatory oversight and local economic interests, with PFNYC advocating vigorously on behalf of New York’s business community.
Source: The Financial Times
Featured News
Nvidia’s $700 Million Buyout of Run:ai Gets EU Approval, Deal Finalized
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Taiwan FTC Halts Uber’s $950M Foodpanda Buyout Over Antitrust Fears
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
White House Pushes for Stronger Healthcare Data Security
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Microsoft’s Cybersecurity Bundles Draw Antitrust Inquiry
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
UK Watchdog to Review IBM’s $6.4 Billion Acquisition of HashiCorp
Jan 1, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand