In a high-stakes legal battle, the National Football League (NFL) has formally requested that a judge nullify a $4.7 billion class action jury verdict, labeling the award “nonsensical” and rejecting claims that subscribers to its “Sunday Ticket” broadcasts were overcharged. The league filed its appeal on Wednesday, calling for either a reversal of the jury’s decision or the commencement of a new trial, according to a Reuters report.
The dispute stems from a June 28 verdict by a Los Angeles federal jury, which concluded that the NFL’s agreements with broadcast partners unfairly limited the availability of “Sunday Ticket.” This restriction allegedly allowed DirecTV, the service’s former exclusive distributor, to impose inflated prices on subscribers.
Court records reveal that the jury’s $4.7 billion award is based on calculations of overcharges affecting 24.1 million residential subscribers over a 12-year period, amounting to $4.6 billion. Additionally, the jury accounted for $96.9 million in overcharges to approximately 506,780 commercial subscribers, such as bars and restaurants.
Related: NFL Antitrust Verdict Amounts to $4.7 Billion in ‘Sunday Ticket’ Case
The plaintiffs, invoking U.S. antitrust laws that permit tripling of damage awards, have requested U.S. District Judge Philip Gutierrez to increase the total to over $14 billion.
“Sunday Ticket” remains the sole option for fans wishing to view out-of-market games, with current residential subscriptions costing up to $449 through its new distributor, Google’s YouTube. Notably, neither DirecTV nor Google were defendants in this case.
The lawsuit claimed that the high “Sunday Ticket” prices were a deliberate strategy to restrict subscriptions and preserve the distribution rights fees that CBS and Fox paid to broadcast local games. The NFL has contested these allegations, arguing in its filing that the jury’s decision was based on flawed testimony from two of the plaintiffs’ expert witnesses, whom the league described as “unreliable.”
The NFL further criticized the jury’s methodology, stating that the awarded amount incorrectly used the list price for “Sunday Ticket” and considered subscriber discounts as overcharges. “The verdict in this case is at once among the largest in American history and also among the least defensible,” the NFL asserted.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand