NFL’s Antitrust Trial Exposes Intent Behind DirecTV’s Exclusive Sunday Ticket Deal
The National Football League’s decision to distribute its Sunday Ticket package exclusively through DirecTV was a strategic move aimed at limiting its reach and preserving high broadcast ratings for CBS and Fox, according to testimony presented at an antitrust trial on Tuesday.
Daniel Rascher, a sports economist at the University of San Francisco, served as an expert witness for Sunday Ticket subscribers who have alleged that they were forced to pay inflated prices to view their preferred teams on Sunday afternoons. The subscribers claim the NFL conspired with CBS and Fox to reduce competition for their broadcasts.
Rascher testified that had the NFL chosen to partner with a cable TV provider, the Sunday Ticket package could have reached as many as 90 million potential customers. Instead, it was limited to DirecTV’s 13 million subscribers. This exclusive agreement was designed to protect the ratings of CBS and Fox’s Sunday afternoon games, which are broadcast for free over the air, thereby enabling these networks to charge more for advertising slots.
“The NFL’s deal with DirecTV ensured that more viewers would tune into CBS and Fox, which, in turn, allowed the networks to pay the NFL a premium for the broadcasting rights,” Rascher explained to the jury in downtown Los Angeles.
Between 2011 and 2023, CBS and Fox collectively paid the NFL $23 billion for the rights to broadcast Sunday afternoon games. During the same period, DirecTV paid the league $15 billion for the exclusive Sunday Ticket package, which offers all games not available on local CBS or Fox broadcasts.
Read more: NFL’s Exclusive Streaming of Playoff Game Raises Antitrust Concerns
“No other professional sport has a similar exclusive arrangement for out-of-market games,” Rascher highlighted during his testimony. “This exclusivity contributes to the high cost of Sunday Ticket.”
DirecTV’s pricing for the Sunday Ticket package was $295 per season. By contrast, in Canada, where regulations mandate broader distribution, the same package costs $149, with a streaming option available for $75.
Testimony from New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft, played for the jury, underscored the NFL’s strategy to keep Sunday Ticket exclusive and expensive. Kraft, who chairs the NFL’s media committee, described a non-exclusive deal as a “non-starter,” arguing that a lower price for Sunday Ticket would undermine the league’s deals with CBS and Fox.
Kraft disclosed that the NFL had previously turned down an offer from Apple for the Sunday Ticket package because Apple’s proposal would have significantly expanded the subscriber base. “We’re not looking to get lots of people,” Kraft stated. “We want to keep it as a premium offering.”
Source: Court House News
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand