Nokia has expressed concerns that the draft rules proposed by the EU to prevent disputes over patents for telecoms equipment and connected cars could potentially place the responsibility and financial burden on patent owners. This could have negative implications for Europe’s leadership in these areas.
The Finnish telecoms equipment maker has stated that their standard essential patents (SEPs) generate approximately 1.5 billion euros ($1.7 billion) in revenues and account for almost 40% of their profits. This statement was made two days prior to the European Commission presenting the draft rules.
As per the proposal reviewed by Reuters, patent owners must register their patents with the EU Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) in order to impose patent fees or initiate legal proceedings.
EUIPO is responsible for overseeing the determination of fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory (FRAND) royalties, with a deadline of nine months for a conclusion.
Related: Nokia Files EU Antitrust Complaint Against VoiceAge EVS
According to Collette Rawnsley, Nokia’s head of IP policy, the proposal lacks balance and fails to address a significant issue for patent owners.
“The leaked draft regulation appears one-sided with additional obligations, burdens and costs falling on SEP owners rather than implementers,” she told Reuters in an interview.
“Unfortunately, there is nothing in the proposal to address the issue of hold-out, where bad faith implementers avoid or delay taking a licence and paying for innovative technology that they are using.”
She said Europe, currently home to leaders in cellular standards, could even lose its lead under the draft rules.
“EU regulatory intervention and changes to the framework for SEP licensing risk making European forums for standardization less attractive. This risks undermining European leadership in these critical technologies,” Rawnsley said.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand