In a legal development on Tuesday, OpenAI and Microsoft found themselves at the center of a lawsuit, accused of improperly utilizing the works of nonfiction authors to train artificial intelligence (AI) models, including OpenAI’s widely-used chatbot, ChatGPT.
The proposed class action, filed in Manhattan federal court, is spearheaded by Julian Sancton, an author and editor at the Hollywood Reporter. Sancton alleges that OpenAI copied tens of thousands of nonfiction books without proper authorization to educate its large language models, enabling them to generate responses to human text prompts.
This lawsuit is part of a broader trend, with several groups of copyright owners, including acclaimed authors such as John Grisham, George R.R. Martin, and Jonathan Franzen, initiating legal action against OpenAI and other tech companies. The authors claim that their literary works were utilized without consent in training AI systems, leading to concerns about intellectual property rights.
Read more: Microsoft To Invest More In OpenAI, As It Looks To Compete With Google In AI
Notably, Julian Sancton’s complaint stands out as the first author-initiated lawsuit against OpenAI that also implicates Microsoft as a defendant. Microsoft, a major player in the tech industry, has invested substantial funds in OpenAI and seamlessly integrated the startup’s AI systems into its own products.
Both OpenAI and Microsoft have firmly denied the allegations brought forth in the lawsuit. The legal battle adds another layer of complexity to the ongoing discourse surrounding the ethical use of copyrighted material in the development of AI technologies. As the case unfolds, it will likely shed light on the evolving landscape of intellectual property rights in the age of artificial intelligence.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand