A privacy advocacy group, NOYB, has filed a complaint against OpenAI, a startup backed by Microsoft, alleging a breach of EU privacy rules due to incorrect information provided by its generative AI chatbot, ChatGPT. The complaint stems from ChatGPT’s failure to rectify inaccurate data despite repeated requests, raising concerns about compliance with data protection regulations.
ChatGPT, hailed for spearheading the GenAI revolution since late 2022, boasts capabilities ranging from mimicking human conversation to generating creative content like poems and theme party ideas, as reported by Reuters. However, NOYB’s complaint centers on ChatGPT’s handling of personal data, specifically regarding a public figure’s birthday inquiry. Instead of disclosing its inability to provide accurate information, ChatGPT allegedly persisted in furnishing incorrect details.
OpenAI reportedly declined the complainant’s request to rectify or erase the data, citing technical limitations. Furthermore, the company purportedly failed to disclose crucial information regarding data processing, including its sources and recipients, as per Reuters. NOYB’s complaint, filed with the Austrian data protection authority, calls for an investigation into OpenAI’s data processing practices and measures ensuring the accuracy of personal data processed by its language models.
Read more: ChatGPT, Bard & Co.: An Introduction to AI for Competition and Regulatory Lawyers
Maartje de Graaf, a data protection lawyer at NOYB, emphasized the necessity for AI systems like ChatGPT to adhere to legal requirements. “If a system cannot produce accurate and transparent results, it cannot be used to generate data about individuals,” de Graaf stated, underscoring the paramount importance of aligning technology with regulatory standards.
OpenAI has previously acknowledged ChatGPT’s tendency to provide “plausible-sounding but incorrect or nonsensical answers,” acknowledging the challenge in addressing this issue, as reported by Reuters. The latest complaint against OpenAI underscores the complexities surrounding AI-driven data processing and the imperative for stringent compliance with privacy regulations.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand