The manufacturer of Suboxone has agreed on a settlement of $102.5 million with 41 states and the District of Columbia. The settlement resolves allegations of anticompetitive practices by the company.
According to Reuters, an agreement with Indivior of North Chesterfield, Virginia has prevented a trial that was scheduled to begin later this year.
Several states, including Wisconsin, have accused the company (formerly a subsidiary of Reckitt Benckiser Pharmaceuticals) of making minor alterations to Suboxone in order to prolong patent protection and prevent the introduction of generic versions of the drug.
Related: Suboxone Manufacturer Must Face Antitrust Suit Brought By 42 States
Suboxone is a combination of buprenorphine and naloxone, and is a unique case separate from other opioid manufacturers who are being sued by governments for their contribution to the nationwide overdose crisis. These lawsuits have resulted in settlements exceeding $50 billion thus far.
As part of the agreement, Indivior is obligated to inform the states of any alterations to their products or shifts in corporate management.
The company stated that resolving the legal dispute will enable it to concentrate on its objectives.
In 2019, Reckitt Benckiser reached an agreement with the federal government to pay $1.4 billion to address potential criminal and civil liability related to its Suboxone business.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand