Marc van der Waude, Marc van der Waude, Nov 01, 2009
The purpose of this contribution is to explore the status types that settlements and reverse payments could have under Article 81 EC. It seeks to identify the elements of the legal tests which could possibly be applied to assess the legality of such settlements and, in particular, those providing for a value transfer from the originator to the generic firm. This will be done as follows: Section 2 summarizes the main findings of the Final Report on settlement agreements; Section 3 makes an inventory of relatively old case law that dealt with comparable issues or those related to patent settlement agreements; and Section 4 makes an attempt to distill a legal test from the two previous sections for the assessment of patent settlement agreements between originator and generic firms under EC competition law.
Featured News
Bipartisan Pair of Lawmakers Introduce Omnibus AI Bill
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
Global Watchdogs Struggle to Track Risks From Advanced AI in Finance
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
EU Clears Airbus–Air France-KLM Joint Venture as Parliament Backs New Trade Scheme
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
California Escalates Pressure on Big Tech with Litigation-Driven Child Safety Bill
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
South Korea Extends Compliance Measures on Hanwha Shipbuilding Deal Until 2029
Apr 28, 2026 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Energy & Data Centers
Apr 27, 2026 by
CPI
AI Data Centers: Competition Law and the Energy Challenge
Apr 27, 2026 by
Charles Whiddington & Domniki Mari
Teaming Up Without Tripping Up: Antitrust Guardrails For Energy Infrastructure Collaborations
Apr 27, 2026 by
Benjamin Huffman, Ann O'Brien & Josh Sturtevant
Mergers Among Electricity Generators: Recent Enforcement and Emerging Trends
Apr 27, 2026 by
Sam Malech & Matt Wohlleben
Energy and Data Centers: Key Competition Considerations
Apr 27, 2026 by
Victoire Binchet, Michael Cousin, Al Mangan & Jugwal Doyen