Incarcerated former pharma executive Martin Shkreli failed to delay an antitrust trial over his role in Vyera Pharmaceuticals’ 4,000% mark-up of an anti-parasitic drug, after a federal judge said the trial wouldn’t interfere with his participation in a drug rehabilitation program.
The Vyera founder’s motion to postpone the trial over antitrust claims brought by the Federal Trade Commission also was “untimely,” Judge Denis Cote said in her order Tuesday.
Related: “Pharma Bro” Martin Shkreli Accused Of Drug Monopoly By Insurer
New York, joined by six states and the Federal Trade Commission, sued Vyera, Shkreli, and other defendants last year alleging anticompetitive efforts to suppress generic competition to maintain a price hike from US$17.50 to US$750 per tablet of the antiparasitic drug Daraprim. The drug is used to treat the potentially fatal infection toxoplasmosis.
The proposed class action accuses them of preventing rivals from capitalizing on the “astronomical” Daraprim price hike—”from US$17.50 to US$750 per tablet”—through resale restrictions in the contracts between Vyera, Phoenixus, and the specialty manufacturers that made the drug’s key ingredients.
Vyera and the defendants had argued “equity does not permit the state plaintiffs (individually or collectively) to pursue nationwide relief on behalf of citizens of other states that are not parties to this litigation.”
Nicknamed “Pharma Bro,” Shkreli is serving a seven-year term for securities fraud. In July, the US government announced that it had sold a one-of-a-kind Wu-Tang Clan album, once owned by Shkreli, to pay off a US$7.36 million forfeiture order tied to the fraud conviction.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand