Posted by D. Daniel Sokol
Malgorzata M. Sadowska (University of Bologna) and Bert Willems (Tilburg University) analyze Power Markets Shaped by Antitrust
ABSTRACT: In November 2011 Sweden abolished the uniform national electricity price and introduced separate price zones.This was the result of an antitrust settlement between the Commission and the Swedish network operator, which was accused of discriminating between domestic and export electricity transmission services and segmenting the internal market. Based on this case, we show how the Commission uses competition law enforcement to foster market integration in the energy sector. We find that, even though the Commission’s action under competition rules was contrived and lacked economic depth, the commitment package provides an economically sound, long term solution to network access and congestion management in Sweden. Such a quick and far-reaching change of Swedish congestion management could not have been achieved by Swedish policymakers or enforcement of the EU sector-specific regulation.
Featured News
UK Regulator Puts Brakes on £762 Million Logistics Merger Amid Competition Fears
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Nvidia’s Acquisition of AI Startup Run.ai Faces EU Antitrust Review
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Voters Across US to Decide on Landmark Gig Economy Issues on November Ballots
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Court Gives Green Light to $110M Deal in Real Estate Commission Dispute
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Mexico’s First-Ever Class Action Targets Pharma Giants for Price Fixing
Nov 3, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI