A law professor recently warned that Warner Bros. Discovery may be close to breaching antitrust laws following the conglomerate’s stunning cancellation of Batgirl.
Speaking to The Hollywood Reporter, University of Southern California law professor Jonathan Barnett expressed concern about the market power now wielded by the recently merged Warner Bros. Discovery Inc., as well as some of the company’s “post-closing actions.” He also queried the company’s likelihood to act in the best interests of media consumers, saying, “You have to ask if this combined entity has sufficient market share to act unilaterally with respect to the traditional parameters of competition, like pricing and output.”
Texas Democrat Rep. Joaquin Castro also argued the recent spending cuts on content raise antitrust concerns, saying there had “already been large cuts throughout the company and they’re anticipating more.” He also lamented the decision to scrap Batgirl as an opportunity lost for meaningful on-screen representation, stating, “This incredibly gifted Latina actress and wonderful story [will] get thrown down the drain for a tax write-off.”
Mergers are only permitted to go ahead if the deal does not incentivize a company to “withdraw a product that a significant number of customers strongly prefer.” Even before the merger of Warner Bros. and Discovery, lawmakers raised concerns that the move could limit inclusive programming; something which appears to have happened almost immediately with the sudden cancellation of Batgirl, fronted by the Latina actor Leslie Grace. WBD scrapped the film after “irredeemable” test screenings, with CEO David Zaslav saying the move was done to “protect the DC brand”. A Warner Bros. Discovery representative later added that the decision to cancel “reflects our leadership’s strategic shift as it relates to the DC universe and HBO Max.”
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand