Qantas, Australia’s flagship airline, has reached a significant settlement with the Australian Consumer and Competition Commission (ACCC) following revelations that it continued to advertise and sell tickets for flights that had already been cancelled for a much longer period than initially thought, dubbed “ghost flights.” The settlement, totaling $120 million in penalties and compensation, marks the conclusion of a Federal Court case initiated by the ACCC last year.
The controversy stemmed from allegations that Qantas had sold tickets for approximately 8,000 flights that were cancelled between May and July 2022. However, upon further investigation, it was discovered that the airline had actually continued to sell tickets for these non-existent flights until legal action was taken by the ACCC in August of the same year. This prolonged period of ticket sales affected a staggering 86,000 customers.
Read more: Australia’s ACCC Seeks Massive Fine for Qantas Violations
Qantas CEO Vanessa Hudson, who assumed her role earlier than planned amidst the fallout from the ghost flights allegations, emphasized that the decision to settle the case was not driven by the recent revelations but rather by the airline’s commitment to transparency and accountability. In an interview on Monday, Hudson stated, “We absolutely were always focused on bringing this to a conclusion. Part of the focus that we have as an organization is around being transparent and taking accountability.”
Despite the settlement, Qantas maintains its stance that it did not accept fees for services it did not provide. Hudson reiterated this, stating, “We absolutely have maintained and continue to maintain that we did not take fees for no service, that we would not take fees for no service, and that the ACCC is no longer proceeding with this part of its claim.”
As part of the settlement agreement, Qantas has agreed to pay $100 million in penalties to the ACCC and an additional $20 million in compensation to the 86,000 affected customers. However, the settlement is subject to approval by the Federal Court.
Source: SMH
Featured News
US Judge OKs $110 Million Settlements in Antitrust Case Against Major Real Estate Brokerages
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
50 States and Territories Reach $49.1 Million Settlement in Generic Drug Price-Fixing Case
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
OpenAI Enhances ChatGPT with New Search Feature, Challenging Google’s Dominance
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
First Circuit Hears Arguments on Whether Federal Baseball Antitrust Exemption Shields Puerto Rican League from Legal Claims
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Federal Appeals Court Expresses Doubts Over FCC’s Authority in Net Neutrality Revival
Oct 31, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Remedies Revisited
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Fixing the Fix: Updating Policy on Merger Remedies
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
Methodology Matters: The 2017 FTC Remedies Study
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
U.S. v. AT&T: Five Lessons for Vertical Merger Enforcement
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI
The Search for Antitrust Remedies in Tech Leads Beyond Antitrust
Oct 30, 2024 by
CPI