The City of Oakland is asking the US Supreme Court to review its antitrust challenge over the relocation of the National Football League’s Raiders to Las Vegas, alleging that it is a victim of an NFL “cartel”, reported Bloomberg.
The city is challenging the ruling of the US Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit that it lacks antitrust standing because of the indirectness of its injuries, the speculative measure of harm, and the difficulty in calculating damages.
If the high court were to reinstate the case, the NFL could face a tough fight, attorney Jeffrey Kessler, a partner with Winston & Strawn in New York told Bloomberg Law. Kessler’s practice includes antitrust and sports law.
“Standing is the league’s best defense,” Kessler said. “The NFL has great trouble on issues of basic liability for restricting the number of teams, so its best defense is to avoid those issues and say the city can’t show it was injured,” he said.
“If the Supreme Court reverses, the league could well be looking at a jury trial to determine whether the city has alleged non-speculative injuries,” Kessler said.
Although the Ninth Circuit deemed the claims speculative, the same could have been said about claims filed by St. Louis over the Rams’ move to Los Angeles, Kessler said. That case was resolved when the NFL and Rams owner Stan Kroenke agreed in November 2021 to pay the city $790 million.
“From an antitrust perspective, the National Football League is an unambiguous cartel,” Oakland said in its petition for a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court. The NFL’s rules allow it to accept “outsized contributions” from cities that want to host a team, including public financing for luxurious stadiums, the city said.
The Raiders were based in Oakland from the creation of the franchise in 1960 until 1982 and again from 1994 to 2019. In 2017, the team announced their intention to relocate to Las Vegas, drawing a lawsuit from Oakland.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand