Realtors Appeal to Supreme Court Over DOJ’s Investigation into Antitrust Violations
The National Association of Realtors (NAR) has filed a petition with the U.S. Supreme Court, requesting it to block the Justice Department from reopening an investigation into the organization’s commission practices. This move follows a previous agreement that ostensibly resolved similar inquiries into the association’s operations.
According to Reuters, the Chicago-based real estate group claims that the Justice Department’s recent actions violate the terms of a settlement reached in 2020, which had closed a prior investigation into its broker commission policies. At that time, federal authorities were examining NAR rules requiring home sellers to offer a commission to buyers’ agents, a provision seen as potentially anticompetitive.
The Justice Department withdrew from this settlement in 2021, arguing that the agreement would impede its capacity to pursue future antitrust claims against the NAR. The association’s petition contests a ruling from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, which allowed the DOJ to revisit the investigation. While the Supreme Court could choose not to hear the case, NAR’s legal team argues that the government must uphold its commitments regardless of political changes.
“Every day, federal agencies resolve civil and criminal enforcement actions through agreements with private parties,” the association’s attorneys at Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan stated in the Supreme Court filing. The NAR’s spokesperson emphasized that this appeal represents a critical effort to hold the Department of Justice accountable to the terms of its previous agreement.
Related: NAR Appeals Circuit Court Decision, Takes DOJ Fight to Supreme Court
The investigation’s focus has returned to rules that required home sellers to offer commissions to buyers’ agents for their listings to appear on multiple listing services (MLS). The DOJ contends that this rule may have violated U.S. antitrust laws by directing buyers’ agents towards properties that promised higher commissions.
Earlier this year, the NAR agreed to pay $418 million to settle a nationwide class-action lawsuit from private plaintiffs over similar claims, further indicating a willingness to revise its commission practices. This settlement, which seeks final approval in a Missouri federal court, does not admit any wrongdoing on the part of the association.
In the wake of the proposed changes, NAR no longer mandates commission offers from agents for listings to appear on MLS, though commission arrangements remain negotiable.
A trial judge in Washington, D.C., previously blocked the DOJ from reopening its investigation, but the appeals court ruled in favor of the department in a 2-1 decision. The majority opinion stated that the Justice Department had made no binding commitment to refrain from launching a new investigation or reopening the closed inquiry.
The case, known as National Association of Realtors v. United States, remains unassigned within the Supreme Court as the NAR seeks clarity on the legal implications of their previous settlement and the authority of the DOJ in this matter.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Malaysia Grants Licenses to WeChat and TikTok Under New Social Media Law
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Axinn Announces Promotions of Antitrust Experts
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Federal Competition Office to Scrutinize High Electricity Prices in Germany
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Mexican Lawmakers Advance Controversial Plan to Dissolve Independent Oversight Bodies
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Motorola Accuses UK of Antitrust Breach Over Terminated Emergency Services Contract
Jan 2, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand