Italy’s competition authority has initiated a detailed investigation into Swisscom’s acquisition of Vodafone Italia, according to a statement from the Swiss telecom company on Thursday. The in-depth review aims to assess the proposed merger under Italian merger control rules.
In March, Swisscom agreed to purchase Vodafone Italia, the Italian unit of Vodafone, for 8 billion euros ($8.8 billion). The merger would combine Vodafone Italia with Swisscom’s existing Italian subsidiary, Fastweb, creating a significant shift in the country’s telecom landscape. If approved, the deal would result in Italy’s second-largest fixed-line broadband operator, trailing only Telecom Italia. Additionally, the merger would position the combined entity as a dominant force in the business sector and a leading player in mobile services.
Related: Vodafone-Three £15 Billion Mega-Merger Faces Delay as CMA Extends Review
Swisscom acknowledged the competition authority’s move, stating that such antitrust reviews are “not uncommon in the telecommunications sector.” The company remains confident in the pro-competitive nature of the acquisition and expects the transaction to be finalized by the first quarter of 2024. “We will continue to work closely and constructively with the Italian competition authority to secure a timely clearance,” the company said in a statement.
Despite the regulatory scrutiny, analysts see limited risk of the deal being blocked. However, there is some concern that the regulator may impose certain conditions or remedies, particularly related to the business sector, where Vodafone and Fastweb hold substantial market shares. According to Reuters, Intesa Sanpaolo analyst Andrea Devita believes that while there is no significant threat to the deal’s success, negotiations over potential remedies could potentially delay the planned completion of the merger.
As Italy’s telecom market remains highly competitive, the outcome of this merger could significantly impact both consumers and businesses. The industry will be closely watching the antitrust authority’s next steps as the process unfolds.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand