Regulators Scrutinize Nvidia’s Graphic Cards Amid Growing Demand and AI Chip Delays
In a recent regulatory filing, Nvidia, the leading U.S. chip giant, revealed that regulators from the European Union, China, and France have requested information about the company’s graphic cards. The inquiries are part of a broader investigation into Nvidia’s sales practices and supply allocation strategies, with additional requests anticipated in the future.
Nvidia, renowned as the world’s largest producer of chips for both artificial intelligence and computer graphics, has experienced a surge in demand for its products. The company’s chips gained widespread attention and utilization following the release of the generative AI application ChatGPT in the latter part of the previous year.
The regulatory scrutiny has intensified, with French authorities taking a more assertive approach. In September, the French watchdog conducted a raid on Nvidia’s local office, as disclosed by an insider familiar with the matter.
“We have also received requests for information from regulators in the European Union and China regarding our sales of GPUs and our efforts to allocate supply, and we expect to receive additional requests for information in the future,” Nvidia stated in the regulatory filing.
Read more: Nvidia Considers Investing in Arm’s IPO
The investigations are likely to focus on Nvidia’s sales practices, market dominance, and the allocation of its in-demand graphics processing units (GPUs). As the demand for GPUs continues to rise, regulators are keen to ensure fair competition and prevent any anti-competitive behavior in the market.
Simultaneously, Nvidia is facing challenges in the development and launch of a new AI chip specifically designed for the Chinese market. According to two sources familiar with the matter, the release of the China-focused AI chip has been delayed. The reasons for the delay were not explicitly mentioned, but it adds another layer of complexity to Nvidia’s current regulatory and operational landscape.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand