By Cristiano Lima & John Hendel
Rep. David Cicilline (D-R.I.), the newly anointed chair of the House Judiciary Committee’s antitrust panel, has spent the opening weeks of his chairmanship pushing to review antitrust and consumer protection laws to see whether they’re compatible with the modern economy. He sat down with POLITICO in his Capitol Hill office last week to discuss his views on some of the companies and mergers that have him concerned, and about competition policy and enforcement more broadly.
How and when do you envision hearings and legislation on tech and antitrust taking shape?
[On hearings,] we’ll look at the existing antitrust statutes because I think we have statues that were essentially designed in response to the railroad monopolies a century ago. The economy’s a little bit different [now]. The concerns that these large technology platforms present are different, so I think [we should be] looking at our existing antitrust statutes and the regulations surrounding them to say, ‘Do they need to be updated or modernized in some way? Are they working effectively? Do they have the right standards?’
And then looking at what we can do legislatively, either update those statutes or provide specific [guidance on] privacy benchmarks, use of data, ways that consumers can really control how their data is used. And then finally looking at the enforcement agencies that are charged with enforcing the competition policy in this country and making sure they have the resources and the personnel and the staff they need to actually do their work successfully.
Featured News
Congress Pushes to Combat AI Deepfakes in Year-End Funding Deal
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Games Board Resignations Linked to DOJ Antitrust Investigation
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Renault Supports Potential Honda-Nissan Merger Talks
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Body Raises Concerns Over AI Market Competition
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Perplexity Caught in Crossfire as DOJ and Google Battle Over Search Dominance
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Remedies After Illumina/GRAIL– The Thorny Question of Proportionality
Dec 17, 2024 by
Aleksander Tombinski & Ciara Denihan
Why Was Illumina/GRAIL Blocked in the EU? Reviewing The European Commission’s Assessment of Vertical Mergers in Light of the 2022 Prohibition Decision
Dec 17, 2024 by
Will Sparks
The Role of Uncertainty in the Future European Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Svend Albaek & Daniel Donath
Illumina’s Light on Article 22 EUMR: The Suspended Step and Uncertain Future of EU Merger Control Over Below-Threshold “Killer” Mergers
Dec 17, 2024 by
Anna Tzanaki
EU-Level Jurisdiction Over “Killer Acquisitions” in the Aftermath of Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Peter Whelan