Republican lawmakers are pressing the Biden administration for an intelligence briefing regarding Microsoft’s $1.5 billion investment in G42, an artificial intelligence firm based in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). This request underscores apprehensions about the potential transfer of U.S.-origin technology to entities with close ties to China.
Congressman Michael McCaul, who chairs the House Foreign Affairs Committee, and John Moolenaar, head of the Select Committee on China, addressed their concerns in a letter to White House National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan. They emphasized the urgency of a briefing before the investment deal moves into its second phase.
“We remain deeply concerned by attempts to move quickly to advance a partnership that involves the unprecedented transfer of highly sensitive, U.S.-origin technology, without congressional consultation or clearly defined regulations in place,” the lawmakers stated in their letter dated July 10.
The U.S. government is contemplating new export controls on various components of AI technology, driven by fears that such technology could fall into the hands of foreign adversaries. Officials highlight that artificial intelligence has the potential to revolutionize military and espionage capabilities, spurring a global race to develop this disruptive technology rapidly.
Read more: Microsoft Strikes Multi-Million-Euro Deal to Settle CISPE’s Antitrust Complaint
Experts point out that the UAE and China maintain close collaborative ties across numerous scientific research fields, heightening concerns over the implications of the Microsoft-G42 deal.
“Given the ties between (China) and G42, as well as (China’s) continued interests in the UAE, we ask that the National Intelligence Council prepare an official Intelligence Community assessment on the ties between G42…to the Chinese Communist Party, the People’s Liberation Army, or any part of (China’s) apparatus, before this partnership proceeds further,” the letter elaborates.
This latest development signifies a broader apprehension within U.S. political circles regarding technology transfers to nations with strong connections to China. The lawmakers’ request aims to ensure that any such partnership is thoroughly vetted to safeguard national security interests.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand