Samsung Electronics has filed a federal lawsuit against its chip supplier, Broadcom Inc., accusing the San Jose, Calif.-based company of violating federal antitrust laws.
The lawsuit, filed on Monday in the US District Court for the Northern District of California, claims Broadcom is preventing Samsung from switching to other suppliers for critical components used in its flagship Galaxy phones.
The suit alleges that Broadcom has created a “tying arrangement” that forces Samsung to purchase essential cellphone components, such as WiFi and GPS chips, exclusively from Broadcom. If Samsung were to source these components from Broadcom’s competitors, it would still be required to pay Broadcom, according to the lawsuit.
Samsung argues that this arrangement effectively eliminates competition and coerces them into a monopoly situation, where they are unable to consider or utilize more competitive options in the market. The lawsuit contends that such practices by Broadcom violate federal antitrust laws designed to promote fair competition and protect consumers from monopolistic behaviors.
This legal action could have significant implications for the tech industry, especially as it highlights ongoing tensions between major technology firms and their suppliers.
Related: AI Money: Broadcom, Oracle and Samsung Unveil Strategies to Dominate AI Market
Source: News Bloomberg Law
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand