Recent actions by the Saudi Arabia competition authority confirm that the agency is adopting a more aggressive enforcement approach, particularly involving consumer-facing companies, reported Lexology.com.
The Saudi Arabian General Authority for Competition (“GAC”) recently announced that its board had blocked the Saudi stock exchange-listed National Gas and Industrialization Co. (“GASCO”) from acquiring a majority stake in Saudi Arabia’s Best Gas Carrier Co. (“Best Gas”) from its sole shareholder. GASCO announced the proposed transaction in February 2022. GASCO is a monopoly wholesale distributor of liquid petroleum gas (“LPG”) (principally butane, propane, and mixtures thereof). Best Gas purchases LPG, empty LPG cylinders, and parts from GASCO and sells filled LPG cylinders to end users.
The GAC board’s announcement states that the proposed merger could allow GASCO to use its position as a monopoly supplier to advantage Best Gas by raising fees or reducing the quality of its products and services to Best Gas competitors. According to the GAC board, that conduct would reduce retail competition and harm consumers. GAC rejected the parties’ claim that the merger would result in efficiencies in LPG distribution, finding the efficiencies insufficient in comparison to the potential harm to competition. The GAC statement indicated that it had studied LPG markets in a number of countries and found that most had liberalized competition in the LPG distribution chain. Those countries tended to limit or prevent vertical integration of LPG distribution stages. GAC’s theory of harm and analysis in this transaction are consistent with recent enforcement actions of vertical transactions by other competition agencies, including in the United States and Europe.
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand