
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday asked for the Biden administration’s views on Apple Inc and Broadcom Inc’s bid to revive their challenges to patents owned by the California Institute of Technology, in a dispute in which Caltech previously won $1.1 billion in damages from the companies.
The justices asked for the US solicitor general’s input on a lower court decision that prevented Apple and Broadcom from arguing the patents were invalid at trial.
Caltech had no comment on the Supreme Court’s order. Representatives Apple and Broadcom did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Related: Bid To Prolong Apple Antitrust Suit Fails
Caltech, located in Pasadena, California, sued Cupertino-based Apple and San Jose-based Broadcom in 2016 in federal court in Los Angeles, alleging that millions of iPhones, iPads, Apple Watches and other devices with Broadcom Wi-Fi chips infringed its data-transmission patents.
Featured News
New York AG Wins Antitrust Battle Against Intermountain Management Over Ski Market Competition
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
Rocket Cos. to Acquire Redfin in $1.75 Billion All-Stock Deal
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
EU Conducts Dawn Raids on Non-Alcoholic Drink Giants Over Competition Concern
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
NY Attorney General Takes Legal Action Against Allstate for Cybersecurity Failures
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
Britain’s Antitrust Regulator Sets Clearer Path for Big Tech Oversight
Mar 10, 2025 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Self-Preferencing
Feb 26, 2025 by
CPI
Platform Self-Preferencing: Focusing the Policy Debate
Feb 26, 2025 by
Michael Katz
Weaponized Opacity: Self-Preferencing in Digital Audience Measurement
Feb 26, 2025 by
Thomas Hoppner & Philipp Westerhoff
Self-Preferencing: An Economic Literature-Based Assessment Advocating a Case-By-Case Approach and Compliance Requirements
Feb 26, 2025 by
Patrice Bougette & Frederic Marty
Self-Preferencing in Adjacent Markets
Feb 26, 2025 by
Muxin Li