The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that a lawsuit against Coinbase must pause while the company tries to take the matter to arbitration.
A case brought by a customer against Coinbase was paused by the decision while the cryptocurrency company appeals an earlier court decision in an effort to have it go to arbitration, Bloomberg reported Friday (June 23).
Supporters of Coinbase had argued that letting the case proceed would have caused unnecessary costs, while those of the customer said a judge should decide whether the proceedings continue during the company’s appeal, according to the report.
Writing for the court, Justice Brett Kavanaugh said: “If the district court could move forward with pre-trial and trial proceedings while the appeal on arbitrability was ongoing, then many of the asserted benefits of arbitration (efficiency, less expense, less intrusive discovery, and the like) would be irretrievably lost.”
Read more: US Supreme Court May Be Called Upon For SEC & Coinbase Securities Case
Arbitration agreements are common in the crypto industry and across retail businesses, according to the report.
The Supreme Court agreed in December 2022 to hear an appeal from Coinbase in two lawsuits against the firm, allowing Coinbase to argue that the suits against it should be resolved in arbitration and not in court.
The case that was addressed in Friday’s decision by the Supreme Court involves a customer who is asking the company to reimburse him $31,000 he said he lost by giving remote account access to a scammer.
Glen Chappell, attorney for plaintiff Abraham Bielski, told CNBC at the time of the Supreme Court’s agreement to hear the case that he and other plaintiffs’ lawyers had opposed Coinbase’s move to take the case to the high court.
“We don’t think that companies like Coinbase should be entitled to an automatic stay of litigation after a district court has already determined their arbitration is unlawful,” Chappell said in December.
The case began when Bielski was contacted by a scammer in 2021 who claimed to be a PayPal rep, and Bielski gave remote access to his Coinbase account, leading to the crypto theft of $31,000.
The customer service offered by Coinbase was reportedly “meager and ineffective,” the case said.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand