The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) recently filed a lawsuit against Binance. US, the American arm of the global crypto exchange Binance, alleging that it had inflated trading volumes through the illegal practice of wash trading. The allegations, if proven, would be a significant blow to the legitimacy of the platform.
The SEC lawsuit and subsequent investigation by the Justice Department have reportedly led to several senior officials’ resignations and a significant drop in the platform’s market share, according to The Wall Street Journal.
Following the lawsuit, Binance. US has reportedly laid off a portion of its staff, about 50 positions.
Court documents reveal that the SEC has been investigating Binance. US since 2020, discovering evidence of hundreds of millions of dollars in profits from the exchange. Binance. US CEO Changpeng Zhao was among those named in the lawsuit.
Read more: Binance Faces Executive Exodus As DOJ Investigation Looms
In response to the lawsuit, Binance. US released a statement denying the allegations, saying, “We categorically deny any allegations of wash trading or misconduct of any kind at Binance. US.” However, despite the denial, the platform’s market share has dropped to less than 1% compared to a year ago.
Despite the regulatory challenges that Binance. US has been facing, the parent exchange, Binance, still has a major portion of the global market share at 52%. The percentage is down from a high of 60% at the start of the year.
It remains to be seen how the U.S. government’s actions will impact the crypto exchange and its customers. In the meantime, customers of Binance. US are being asked to withdraw their funds in order to comply with the SEC’s legal proceedings.
The SEC’s case against Binance. US could have major implications in the world of digital assets and serves as a reminder of the importance for all crypto exchanges to comply with regulations in order to stay legitimate.
Source: WSJ
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand