The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has denied requests from technology giant Apple Inc. and entertainment powerhouse Disney to exclude shareholder votes on their use of artificial intelligence (AI) from their upcoming annual meetings. The ruling comes after similar proposals were filed by the AFL-CIO, the largest American labor union federation, raising concerns about the ethical implications and oversight of AI deployment, reported Reuters.
In notices dated January 3, the SEC dismissed attempts by Apple and Disney to sidestep calls for reports on their AI practices, signaling a growing focus on transparency in the rapidly evolving landscape of technology integration in corporate operations.
Corporations across sectors have increasingly embraced AI for its promised efficiencies, but the SEC’s decision reflects a broader concern regarding the potential replacement of creative and professional workers and the need for fair treatment, echoing recent labor disputes in Hollywood and a lawsuit by The New York Times.
The AFL-CIO’s pension trust, which filed the shareholder proposals, seeks to shed light on Apple’s use of AI in its business operations and urges the company to disclose any ethical guidelines adopted for AI technology. Similarly, the group has asked Disney to report on its board’s role in overseeing the usage of AI.
Related: SEC Rules Apple and Disney Must Face Shareholder Votes on AI Use
The AFL-CIO’s supporting statement at Apple emphasizes the importance of AI systems being ethically trained, stating that they “should not be trained on copyrighted works or the voices, likenesses, and performances of professional performers without transparency, consent, and compensation to creators and rights holders.”
Brandon Rees, deputy director of the AFL-CIO’s office of investment, expressed optimism about the SEC’s decisions, suggesting that they could pave the way for agreements with Apple and Disney aligning their AI disclosures with industry standards, citing Microsoft as an example.
“Apple and Disney haven’t even begun to grapple with these ethical issues around AI,” Rees remarked, highlighting the potential for the SEC’s decision to push these tech giants towards a more responsible approach to AI utilization.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Judge Allows FTC Antitrust Case Against Amazon to Move Forward
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
SAP Leader Urges Caution on EU AI Rules, Warns of Competitive Disadvantage
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Colorado’s Grocery Workers Unite to Oppose $24.6 Billion Supermarket Merge
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Canada’s Competition Bureau Warns Businesses of Tougher Enforcement
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Top Antitrust Lawyers Launch New Boutique Firm
Oct 1, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh