Senator Amy Klobuchar has raised concerns over possible collusion in healthcare pricing, urging federal regulators to investigate the role of data analytics firm MultiPlan in facilitating alleged price fixing among major health insurers. This comes following a recent report by the New York Times shedding light on MultiPlan’s influence in the pricing of out-of-network medical claims.
In a letter addressed to the heads of the Justice Department’s antitrust division and the Federal Trade Commission, Senator Klobuchar emphasized the need to examine whether MultiPlan’s algorithms have enabled insurers to conspire in reducing payments to doctors, potentially leading to higher bills for patients. She argued that algorithms should enhance decision-making accuracy and efficiency, not enable collusion to the detriment of patients.
MultiPlan, a significant player in the healthcare industry, provides pricing recommendations for out-of-network medical claims, often resulting in reduced payments to providers. According to reports, this practice allows MultiPlan and its partner insurers to increase their profits, albeit at the expense of patients who may face higher bills due to unpaid balances.
Major insurers such as UnitedHealthcare, Cigna, and Aetna rely on MultiPlan’s pricing recommendations, with the firm boasting its integral role in clients’ claims-processing systems to investors. Critics argue that this arrangement could potentially amount to price fixing, as insurers may opt to follow MultiPlan’s low pricing recommendations rather than competing to offer better coverage.
Experts in antitrust law, including Barak Orbach from the University of Arizona, have echoed concerns, suggesting that the situation warrants investigation by regulatory agencies. Orbach highlighted the apparent strength of the case against MultiPlan and its partners, emphasizing the need for thorough scrutiny.
Source: NY Times
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand