A lawsuit alleges that Silicon Valley Bank’s parent company did not disclose risk to investors.
The class-action complaint alleges that because of failure to disclose risk, the plaintiffs were damaged when SVB Financial Group sold its securities at “artificially inflated prices” and later released an “alleged corrective disclosure.”
The suit was filed Monday (March 13) in U.S. District Court, Northern District of California, on behalf of people who purchased the company’s publicly traded securities between June 16, 2021, and March 10, 2023.
It names as defendants SVB Financial Group, SVB CEO Greg W. Becker and SVB Chief Financial Officer Daniel Beck.
Read more: Silicon Valley Bank’s UK Unit Saved by HSBC in Rapid Overnight Rescue Deal
The suit alleges that in several filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the defendants did not disclose the risk that future interest rate hikes posed to the company’s business, that it would be worse off than other banks in an environment of high interest rates, and that it was particularly susceptible to a bank run if its investments were negatively impacted by high interest rates.
“As a result, defendants’ public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times,” the suit said.
Then, in a March 8 press release, SVB announced that it sold $21 billion of securities in a move that would cause an after-tax loss of $1.8 billion, according to the suit.
This, in turn, triggered concerns among clients, a plunge in its share price and a liquidity crisis, the suit said.
“It quickly emerged that the culprit behind the liquidity crisis that caused SVB’s eventual collapse was rapidly rising interest rates,” the suit said.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand