Cryptocurrency and digital asset companies can expect greater scrutiny from banks in Singapore.
Banks, the central bank and police in the city-state are working together to develop standards for vetting potential customers from these sectors, Bloomberg reported Thursday (April 6), citing unnamed sources.
The project has been underway for six months and a report outlining best practices is expected to be released within two months, the report said.
The proposed standards will cover the firms associated with crypto, stablecoins, non-fungible tokens (NFTs), transferable gaming or streaming credits, and the payments, trading and transfers associated with these assets, per the report.
Related: G20 Nations Consider Collaboration To Regulate Crypto
The development of these standards comes at a time when crypto firms are finding it more difficult than ever to access traditional banks because fallout around the failures of crypto-related firms, regulatory pressures and the collapse of crypto client-friendly Silvergate Capital and Signature Bank, according to the report.
Singapore has also been looking at other aspects of the crypto industry.
In August 2022, the head of the city-state’s central bank said the organization was weighing new measures to restrict and discourage speculation in trading crypto.
“Many consumers are still enticed by the prospect of sharp price increases in cryptocurrencies,” Ravi Menon, managing director of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS), said Aug. 29. “They seem to be irrationally oblivious about the risks of cryptocurrency trading.”
Menon said at the time that MAS is going to continue to promote Singapore as a FinTech hub and attract leading crypto players to Singapore but will keep its “stringent and lengthy licensing process” in place.
Featured News
Congress Pushes to Combat AI Deepfakes in Year-End Funding Deal
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Games Board Resignations Linked to DOJ Antitrust Investigation
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Renault Supports Potential Honda-Nissan Merger Talks
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea’s Antitrust Body Raises Concerns Over AI Market Competition
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Perplexity Caught in Crossfire as DOJ and Google Battle Over Search Dominance
Dec 18, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Remedies After Illumina/GRAIL– The Thorny Question of Proportionality
Dec 17, 2024 by
Aleksander Tombinski & Ciara Denihan
Why Was Illumina/GRAIL Blocked in the EU? Reviewing The European Commission’s Assessment of Vertical Mergers in Light of the 2022 Prohibition Decision
Dec 17, 2024 by
Will Sparks
The Role of Uncertainty in the Future European Horizontal Merger Guidelines: Lessons Learned From Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Svend Albaek & Daniel Donath
Illumina’s Light on Article 22 EUMR: The Suspended Step and Uncertain Future of EU Merger Control Over Below-Threshold “Killer” Mergers
Dec 17, 2024 by
Anna Tzanaki
EU-Level Jurisdiction Over “Killer Acquisitions” in the Aftermath of Illumina/GRAIL
Dec 17, 2024 by
Peter Whelan