The scrutiny comes after Grab announced its intention to acquire Trans-cab in July, forming a formidable fleet of over 2,500 vehicles encompassing both taxis and private-hire vehicles owned by Trans-cab, per Reuters.
Following the submission of requisite documents by the involved parties on January 25, the CCCS expressed its inability to confirm that the deal would not lead to competition concerns, prompting the current in-depth review.
The CCCS, in a statement, declared, “Upon completion of the review, the CCCS will decide whether to issue a favorable or an unfavorable decision on the proposed acquisition.”
One major point of contention identified by the commission is Grab’s proposed two-year duration to address the competition concerns raised. The CCCS deems this timeline inadequate, emphasizing the need for a more comprehensive and prolonged commitment to ensure a competitive landscape in the ride-hailing and taxi industry.
Additionally, the commission raised concerns about the efficacy of Grab’s self-policing monitoring mechanism. The CCCS argues that the current system is insufficient, calling for a more robust framework to guarantee fair competition within the market.
This development underscores the regulatory scrutiny that large-scale acquisitions in the transportation sector face. As the CCCS delves into the details of the proposed deal, stakeholders are keenly awaiting the outcome, which could potentially reshape the competitive dynamics of Singapore’s ride-hailing and taxi industry.
Source: Reuters
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand