The bid for Microsoft to buy Activision-Blizzard continues to devolve as Sony accuses its biggest competitor of obvious harassment. The accusation comes on the heels of the U.K.‘s competition regulator provisionally concluding that the deal would harm gamers and competition in the gaming market.
The accusations were made by Sony after Microsoft filed a motion in court to make the company hand over performance reviews for its leadership. Sony fought the motion, saying, “Even in employment cases courts require a specific showing of relevance before requiring production of personnel files.” It went on to say, “This is not an employment case,” and that it was “obvious harassment.”
Related: Microsoft Says Sony Is Misleading European Commissioners
Presiding Judge D. Michael Chappell ruled in agreement with Sony, stating, “SIE has demonstrated good cause for the requested relief,” according to a report by Kotaku.Activision-Blizzard CEO Bobby Kotick has been very outspoken in recent days concerning the controversy surrounding the deal with Microsoft. Kotick made the remark ahead of the CMA’s provisional finding that if the regulators blocked the deal it would make the U.K. look like “Death Valley,” instead of a Silicon Valley. The CEO also remarked in a recent interview that Sony had not only stopped talking to Microsoft, but that it had also cut the lines of communication with Activision-Blizzard as well.
Kotick added, “I think this is all Sony just trying to sabotage the transaction. The whole idea that we are not going to support a PlayStation or that Microsoft would not support the PlayStation, it is absurd.”
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand