WBHO will oppose the referral of a case by the Competition Commission to the Competition Tribunal in which it is alleged that the company colluded with Group Five by fixing contractual conditions for road improvements.
The JSE-listed construction and engineering group’s company secretary, Shereen Vally-Kara, said on Monday, WBHO did not agree that a meeting between itself and Group Five in 2006 was a contravention as alleged by the commission, “… and we have in any event already settled this project as part of the fast-track settlement process in 2013”.
The commission began investigations into the construction sector in 2009 “after receiving evidence that collusion was pervasive in the industry”. It then launched a fast-track settlement process in 2011 to speed up resolution of the cases.
WBHO’s rebuttal came after the commission on Monday issued a press release stating it had referred to the tribunal the “last case” arising from its probe into bid-rigging in the construction sector. The commission said WBHO had colluded with Group Five by fixing contractual conditions relating to the N17 link road between New Canada and Soccer City in Johannesburg.
Full content: BD Live
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand