Spanish market regulator CNMC has issued a €180,000 euro fine on the Illustrious College of Lawyers of Madrid (ICAM), a law school, for uncompetitive practices demanding that attorneys keep an office within their territorial area of influence before joining with the school’s in-court and pro-bono services, an important source of experience for new practitioners.
Authorities found that ICAM had carried out “practices which restrict competition for over 6 years, consisting on a dividing of the market which limits competition in specific geographical regions, damaging the principle of Single Collegiate certification provided by the Law.” The Community of Madrid is currently served by two law schools: the Madrid (ICAM) and Alcalá de Henares (ICAAH), with each covering a specific and well-marked territory.
The ICAM required, through its internal regulation, for lawyers to open a practicing law office within the school’s territory, before these lawyers could participate in the in-court and pro-bono counsel services the ICAM runs for the benefit of it’s territory’s courts.
The CNMC concluded that the requirement for attorneys to operate a law office within the ICAM’s territory would be disproportional, considering the desirable end of the in-court and pro-bono services program, which is to offer better and faster service, as well as violating competition law by limiting supply in the available market, engaging in territorial division and for setting discriminatory conditions to graduates of other law colleges.
Full Content: El Economista
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletter for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand