Spain’s CNMC has issued sanctions on the Illustrious College of Attorneys of Madrid (ICAM) and the Illustrious College of Attorneys of Alcalá de Henares (ICAAH), foro 459,024 euros and 25,264 euros respectively, for violating the country’s competition laws. The professional associations have been accused of issuing ‘recommendations’ to their members, suggesting specific price ranges. This goes against the existing competition legislation for Professional Colleges, which forbids making collective recommendations on prices, including on purely advisory material.
Spanish authorities have found that in 2013 ICAM published a compilation of criteria for the issuing of professional fees which equalled a recommendation on prices, as the compendium included no real criteria, but rather a list of fees that should be charged by attorneys. The case against the ICAAH has also been traced back to 2013, focusing on advisory guidelines for lawyer fees published on the group’s website.
The CNMC has warned the colleges to avoid similar behavior in the future. Both organizations will also be forced to communicate the complete text of the authority’s resolution to their collegiate members.
Full Content: CNMC
Want more news? Subscribe to CPI’s free daily newsletterr for more headlines and updates on antitrust developments around the world.
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand