The Supreme Court is preparing to hear a petition filed by the Competition Commission of India (CCI) to consolidate multiple cases related to its 2019 antitrust investigation against e-commerce giants Amazon and Flipkart. The CCI argues that conflicting rulings from different high courts could undermine the integrity of the investigation, prompting the need for a unified judicial forum, according to CNBC TV18.
The CCI’s antitrust probe centers on allegations of unfair trade practices by the two companies, including preferential treatment of certain sellers, deep discounting, and promoting exclusive arrangements. These actions are claimed to violate Indian competition laws and harm smaller businesses trying to compete in the digital marketplace.
Read more: India Raids Amazon, Flipkart Seller Offices in Foreign Investment Probe
The investigation was sparked by complaints from the Delhi Vyapar Mahasangh (DVM), a group representing small traders. The DVM accused Amazon and Flipkart of practices that stifle competition, including providing special privileges to preferred sellers. Among these allegations are claims that Amazon’s Cloudtail and Appario, and Flipkart’s Omnitech Retail, benefit from reduced platform fees and greater visibility. This preferential treatment allegedly enables these sellers to offer discounts that smaller sellers cannot match.
Additionally, the e-commerce platforms have faced criticism for promoting their own private label products through these preferred sellers, disadvantaging independent brands. The CCI probe also highlighted exclusive deals with manufacturers, which restrict consumer choice and limit competition in the market.
The CCI has expressed concerns that fragmented rulings from various high courts could hinder its ability to address the overarching competition issues posed by the eCommerce giants. By seeking consolidation of the cases in the Supreme Court, the regulator aims to streamline legal proceedings and ensure a consistent approach to the investigation.
Source: CNBC TV18
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand