The Swiss Financial Market Supervisory Authority (FINMA) is extending the scope of its anti-money laundering (AML) ordinance to cover cryptocurrency assets.
The adjusted regulations, which will come into effect Jan. 1, 2023, mean that customers will have to prove their identity if they make transactions that total 1,000 Swiss francs (about $1,003) or more during a one-month period when they trade crypto for cash or another anonymous form of money, FINMA said in a Wednesday (Nov. 2) press release.
The amendments are the result of a consultation during which the regulator assessed how best to interpret and enforce new AML laws, the release stated.
Related: EU Agrees On Strong AML Rules For Crypto Transactions
While some in the Swiss crypto industry argued that the 1,000-franc threshold would create unnecessary roadblocks to legitimate crypto transactions and should be raised to as much as 25,000 Swiss francs (about $25,008), according to a CoinDesk report, FINMA ultimately rebuffed requests for a higher limit for unverified transactions.
In recent times, Switzerland has sought to establish itself as a crypto hub, and the country is home to several regulated crypto banks that serve some of the world’s largest digital asset platforms.
“Traditionally, Swiss banks are considered among the most secure in the world with a high level of protection against fraud, making the Alpine nation a top destination for businesses and individuals looking to keep their wealth safe,” PYMNTS wrote last month.
However, in the past, money launderers have tried to take advantage of Switzerland’s banking secrecy laws, and regulators have been at pains to disassociate the Swiss financial services sector from criminal funds and dark money, CoinDesk reported.
For example, the government recently proposed a registry of company ownership that will make it harder to hide the true ownership of assets through shell companies.
Featured News
CVS Health Explores Potential Breakup Amid Investor Pressure: Report
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
DirecTV Acquires Dish TV, Creating 20 Million-Subscriber Powerhouse
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
South Korea Fines Kakao Mobility $54.8 Million for Anti-Competitive Practices
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Google Offers Settlement in India’s Antitrust Case Regarding Smart TVs
Oct 3, 2024 by
CPI
Attorney Challenges NCAA’s $2.78 Billion Settlement in Landmark Antitrust Cases
Oct 3, 2024 by
nhoch@pymnts.com
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – Refusal to Deal
Sep 27, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust’s Refusal-to-Deal Doctrine: The Emperor Has No Clothes
Sep 27, 2024 by
Erik Hovenkamp
Why All Antitrust Claims are Refusal to Deal Claims and What that Means for Policy
Sep 27, 2024 by
Ramsi Woodcock
The Aspen Misadventure
Sep 27, 2024 by
Roger Blair & Holly P. Stidham
Refusal to Deal in Antitrust Law: Evolving Jurisprudence and Business Justifications in the Align Technology Case
Sep 27, 2024 by
Timothy Hsieh