The US Federal Communications Commission (FCC) announced its approval on Thursday of T-Mobile’s acquisition of Ka’ena Corporation, the parent company of prominent prepaid wireless brands Mint Mobile and Ultra Mobile. According to Reuters, the deal, valued at potentially up to $1.35 billion, is poised to significantly enhance T-Mobile’s operational capabilities and customer offerings.
The acquisition is primed to grant T-Mobile more direct control over Mint Mobile and Ultra Mobile, both of which currently operate on its expansive network infrastructure. By integrating these brands into its portfolio, T-Mobile aims to streamline services and facilitate easier transitions for customers between providers, as reported by Reuters. With regulatory hurdles cleared, T-Mobile is poised to finalize the acquisition on May 1, pending final procedural steps.
Read more: Judge Orders T-Mobile to Face Suit Alleging Anti-Competitive Practices
During an earnings call on Thursday, T-Mobile’s CEO, Mike Sievert, expressed his enthusiasm regarding the regulatory green light, stating, “I am so happy to report that we have received regulatory approval to acquire Mint and Ultra Mobile.” Sievert emphasized the alignment between T-Mobile’s customer-centric approach and the value propositions of the acquired brands, affirming, “We are really looking forward to welcoming them to the ‘uncarrier’ family. And I know they are going to fit in because they are hyper-focused on offering customers compelling products at a great value.”
The acquisition agreement, initially announced in March 2023, outlined a financial arrangement comprising 39% cash and 61% stock, as disclosed by T-Mobile in a previous release. Notably, the final sales price is contingent upon Ka’ena Corporation’s performance during specific periods before and after the transaction’s closure, further illustrating the dynamic nature of the deal.
Source: C Net
Featured News
Electrolux Fined €44.5 Million in French Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Indian Antitrust Body Raids Alcohol Giants Amid Price Collusion Probe
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Attorneys Seek $525 Million in Fees in NCAA Settlement Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Italy’s Competition Watchdog Ends Investigation into Booking.com
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Minnesota Judge Approves $2.4 Million Hormel Settlement in Antitrust Case
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand