Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, the world’s leading manufacturer of generic drugs, is expected to face a significant antitrust fine from the EU in the coming weeks.
The fine stems from allegations that the Israeli pharmaceutical giant engaged in anti-competitive behavior related to its popular multiple sclerosis medication, Copaxone. Sources with direct knowledge of the situation revealed that Teva is accused of disparaging rival products to maintain Copaxone’s market dominance.
The European Commission’s investigation, which began with dawn raids in 2019 and led to formal proceedings in 2021, centers on claims that Teva misused the patent system. The Commission contends that Teva’s actions were designed to artificially prolong Copaxone’s patent protection and prevent competition. This enforcement action reflects the EU’s broader concerns about practices that might hinder innovation in the pharmaceutical sector, especially in a landscape constrained by tight healthcare budgets.
Related: FTC Intervenes in Teva’s Inhaler Litigation Against Amneal Amid Patent Crackdown
Bloomberg reports that the European Commission has not commented on the impending fine, and Teva has not yet responded to requests for a statement. The Commission’s rigorous stance underscores the EU’s commitment to addressing anti-competitive practices that could impact market dynamics and drug affordability.
In a related development, Teva and its subsidiary Cephalon faced a fine of 60.5 million euros ($66.7 million) in 2020 for engaging in pay-for-delay schemes, where they agreed to delay the release of a cheaper generic version of Cephalon’s sleep disorder medication. This fine was part of a broader EU crackdown on such practices between brand-name drugmakers and their generic counterparts.
Source: Bloomberg
Featured News
Judge Appoints Law Firms to Lead Consumer Antitrust Litigation Against Apple
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Epic Health Systems Seeks Dismissal of Antitrust Suit Filed by Particle Health
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Qualcomm Secures Partial Victory in Licensing Dispute with Arm, Jury Splits on Key Issues
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Google Proposes Revised Revenue-Sharing Limits Amid Antitrust Battle
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Japan’s Antitrust Authority Expected to Sanction Google Over Monopoly Practices
Dec 22, 2024 by
CPI
Antitrust Mix by CPI
Antitrust Chronicle® – CRESSE Insights
Dec 19, 2024 by
CPI
Effective Interoperability in Mobile Ecosystems: EU Competition Law Versus Regulation
Dec 19, 2024 by
Giuseppe Colangelo
The Use of Empirical Evidence in Antitrust: Trends, Challenges, and a Path Forward
Dec 19, 2024 by
Eliana Garces
Some Empirical Evidence on the Role of Presumptions and Evidentiary Standards on Antitrust (Under)Enforcement: Is the EC’s New Communication on Art.102 in the Right Direction?
Dec 19, 2024 by
Yannis Katsoulacos
The EC’s Draft Guidelines on the Application of Article 102 TFEU: An Economic Perspective
Dec 19, 2024 by
Benoit Durand